Abbey vs Collingwood Heights
Property investment comparison - Abbey, WA 6280 vs Collingwood Heights, WA 6330
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbey wins 1, Collingwood Heights wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abbey | Collingwood Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | - | $495K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.30% | 2.55% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.14% | 6.28% |
| 1-year house growth | +21.8%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 1.4% |
| Population | 1,321 | 694 |
Abbey vs Collingwood Heights: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Collingwood Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.55%, compared with 2.30% in Abbey, a gap of 0.25 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Abbey and 1.4% in Collingwood Heights, so landlords in Abbey face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Abbey is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,321 against 694, larger than Collingwood Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Collingwood Heights for rental income, Abbey for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Collingwood Heights, WA 6330
Open Collingwood Heights suburb profileRecent sales in Collingwood Heights
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison