Abbey vs Wannanup
Property investment comparison - Abbey, WA 6280 vs Wannanup, WA 6210
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbey wins 2, Wannanup wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abbey | Wannanup |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | - | $1M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.30% | 3.60% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.14% | 3.76% |
| 1-year house growth | +21.8%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 1.4% |
| Population | 1,321 | 4,142 |
Abbey vs Wannanup: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Wannanup leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.60%, compared with 2.30% in Abbey, a gap of 1.30 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Abbey and 1.4% in Wannanup, so landlords in Abbey face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Wannanup is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,142 against 1,321, roughly 3.1 times the size of Abbey; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wannanup for rental income, Abbey for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison