Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Belimbla Park

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Belimbla Park, NSW 2570

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 3, Belimbla Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyBelimbla Park
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$715K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%4.28%
1-year house growth+10.8%+9.5%
3-year house growth+22.3%+20.8%
Vacancy rate5.2%0.9%
Population4,200576

Abbotsbury vs Belimbla Park: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $715K in Belimbla Park, which makes Belimbla Park the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +9.5% in Belimbla Park, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Belimbla Park houses +20.8%, so Abbotsbury has compounded faster than Belimbla Park over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Belimbla Park and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Belimbla Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 576, roughly 7 times the size of Belimbla Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Belimbla Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison