Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Bexhill

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Bexhill, NSW 2480

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 1, Bexhill wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyBexhill
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$450K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%5.04%
1-year house growth+10.8%+8.8%
3-year house growth+22.3%+32.7%
Vacancy rate5.2%2.9%
Population4,200528

Abbotsbury vs Bexhill: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $450K in Bexhill, which makes Bexhill the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +8.8% in Bexhill, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Bexhill houses +32.7%, so Bexhill has compounded faster than Abbotsbury over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.9% in Bexhill and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Bexhill face less competition for tenants.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 528, roughly 8 times the size of Bexhill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Bexhill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Abbotsbury vs Bexhill: Property Investment Comparison (2026)