Abbotsbury vs Bogan Gate
Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Bogan Gate, NSW 2876
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 1, Bogan Gate wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abbotsbury | Bogan Gate |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $770K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.81% | 5.12% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.36% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +10.8% | +21.9% |
| 3-year house growth | +22.3% | +0.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 5.2% | - |
| Population | 4,200 | 269 |
Abbotsbury vs Bogan Gate: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Bogan Gate leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.12%, compared with 2.81% in Abbotsbury, a gap of 2.31 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +21.9% in Bogan Gate, so recent momentum favours Bogan Gate, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Bogan Gate houses +0.0%, so Abbotsbury has compounded faster than Bogan Gate over the longer window.
Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 269, roughly 16 times the size of Bogan Gate; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bogan Gate for rental income, Bogan Gate for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison