Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Bulli

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Bulli, NSW 2516

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 3, Bulli wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyBulli
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$770K$875K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%4.40%
1-year house growth+10.8%+7.5%
3-year house growth+22.3%+12.0%
Vacancy rate5.2%0.9%
Population4,2006,798

Abbotsbury vs Bulli: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Abbotsbury and $1.8M in Bulli, so Bulli is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $875K in Bulli, which makes Abbotsbury the more affordable unit market and Bulli the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +7.5% in Bulli, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Bulli houses +12.0%, so Abbotsbury has compounded faster than Bulli over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Bulli and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Bulli face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bulli is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,798 against 4,200, larger than Abbotsbury; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bulli for a lower purchase price, Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Bulli for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison