Abbotsbury vs Coogee
Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Coogee, NSW 2034
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 3, Coogee wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abbotsbury | Coogee |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $770K | $1.6M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.81% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.36% | 3.12% |
| 1-year house growth | +10.8% | -2.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +22.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 5.2% | 2.9% |
| Population | 4,200 | 14,634 |
Abbotsbury vs Coogee: what the numbers say
For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $1.6M in Coogee, which makes Abbotsbury the more affordable unit market and Coogee the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and -2.2% in Coogee (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, while Coogee went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 2.9% in Coogee and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Coogee face less competition for tenants.
Coogee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,634 against 4,200, roughly 3.5 times the size of Abbotsbury; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Coogee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison