Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Daceyville

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Daceyville, NSW 2032

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 2, Daceyville wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyDaceyville
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$920K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%2.82%
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%-
1-year house growth+10.8%-3.8%
3-year house growth+22.3%-
Vacancy rate5.2%2.5%
Population4,2001,146

Abbotsbury vs Daceyville: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $920K in Daceyville, which makes Abbotsbury the more affordable unit market and Daceyville the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 2.81% in Abbotsbury and 2.82% in Daceyville, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and -3.8% in Daceyville, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, while Daceyville went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 2.5% in Daceyville and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Daceyville face less competition for tenants.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 1,146, roughly 3.7 times the size of Daceyville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Daceyville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison