Abbotsbury vs Fassifern
Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Fassifern, NSW 2283
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 1, Fassifern wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abbotsbury | Fassifern |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $770K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.81% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.36% | 4.26% |
| 1-year house growth | +10.8% | +11.1% |
| 3-year house growth | +22.3% | +26.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 5.2% | 1.5% |
| Population | 4,200 | 586 |
Abbotsbury vs Fassifern: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +11.1% in Fassifern, so recent momentum favours Fassifern, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Fassifern houses +26.7%, so Fassifern has compounded faster than Abbotsbury over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Fassifern and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Fassifern face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 586, roughly 7 times the size of Fassifern; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Fassifern for recent price momentum, Fassifern for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison