Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Fishing Point

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Fishing Point, NSW 2283

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 1, Fishing Point wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyFishing Point
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$600K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%5.18%
1-year house growth+10.8%+10.5%estimate
3-year house growth+22.3%-
Vacancy rate5.2%1.4%
Population4,2001,105

Abbotsbury vs Fishing Point: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $600K in Fishing Point, which makes Fishing Point the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +10.5% in Fishing Point (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Fishing Point and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Fishing Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 1,105, roughly 3.8 times the size of Fishing Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Fishing Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Abbotsbury vs Fishing Point: Suburb Comparison 2026