Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Glenhaven

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Glenhaven, NSW 2156

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 4, Glenhaven wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyGlenhaven
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%2.26%
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%3.12%
1-year house growth+10.8%-4.7%
3-year house growth+22.3%-3.1%
Vacancy rate5.2%4.7%
Population4,2006,619

Abbotsbury vs Glenhaven: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Abbotsbury leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.81%, compared with 2.26% in Glenhaven, a gap of 0.55 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and -4.7% in Glenhaven, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, while Glenhaven went backwards.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Glenhaven houses -3.1%, so Abbotsbury has compounded faster than Glenhaven over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 4.7% in Glenhaven and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Glenhaven face less competition for tenants.

Glenhaven is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,619 against 4,200, larger than Abbotsbury; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for rental income, Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Glenhaven for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison