Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Holmesville

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Holmesville, NSW 2286

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 2, Holmesville wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyHolmesville
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$600K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%4.10%
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%2.91%
1-year house growth+10.8%+8.8%estimate
3-year house growth+22.3%-
Vacancy rate5.2%1.1%
Population4,2001,413

Abbotsbury vs Holmesville: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $600K in Holmesville, which makes Holmesville the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.

On cash flow, Holmesville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 2.81% in Abbotsbury, a gap of 1.29 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +8.8% in Holmesville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Holmesville and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Holmesville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 1,413, roughly 3.0 times the size of Holmesville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Holmesville for rental income, Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Holmesville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison