Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Marks Point

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Marks Point, NSW 2280

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 1, Marks Point wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyMarks Point
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$690K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%3.52%
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%4.40%
1-year house growth+10.8%+7.3%estimate
3-year house growth+22.3%-
Vacancy rate5.2%0.9%
Population4,2001,861

Abbotsbury vs Marks Point: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $690K in Marks Point, which makes Marks Point the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.

On cash flow, Marks Point leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.52%, compared with 2.81% in Abbotsbury, a gap of 0.71 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +7.3% in Marks Point (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Marks Point and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Marks Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 1,861, roughly 2.3 times the size of Marks Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Marks Point for rental income, Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Marks Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Abbotsbury vs Marks Point: Suburb Comparison 2026