Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Mount Vernon

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Mount Vernon, NSW 2178

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 3, Mount Vernon wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyMount Vernon
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$1.5M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%-
1-year house growth+10.8%+8.6%
3-year house growth+22.3%+80.0%
Vacancy rate5.2%9.7%
Population4,2001,235

Abbotsbury vs Mount Vernon: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $1.5M in Mount Vernon, which makes Abbotsbury the more affordable unit market and Mount Vernon the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +8.6% in Mount Vernon, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Mount Vernon houses +80.0%, so Mount Vernon has compounded faster than Abbotsbury over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 5.2% in Abbotsbury and 9.7% in Mount Vernon, so landlords in Abbotsbury face less competition for tenants.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 1,235, roughly 3.4 times the size of Mount Vernon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Abbotsbury for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison