Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Otford

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Otford, NSW 2508

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 3, Otford wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyOtford
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$910K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%2.11%
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%4.37%
1-year house growth+10.8%-0.1%
3-year house growth+22.3%-
Vacancy rate5.2%1.2%
Population4,200396

Abbotsbury vs Otford: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $910K in Otford, which makes Abbotsbury the more affordable unit market and Otford the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abbotsbury leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.81%, compared with 2.11% in Otford, a gap of 0.70 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and -0.1% in Otford, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, while Otford went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Otford and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Otford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 396, roughly 11 times the size of Otford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for rental income, Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Otford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison