Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Quirindi

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Quirindi, NSW 2343

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 1, Quirindi wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyQuirindi
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%5.82%
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%4.15%
1-year house growth+10.8%+23.0%
3-year house growth+22.3%+45.2%
Vacancy rate5.2%0.6%
Population4,2003,355

Abbotsbury vs Quirindi: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Quirindi leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.82%, compared with 2.81% in Abbotsbury, a gap of 3.01 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +23.0% in Quirindi, so recent momentum favours Quirindi, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Quirindi houses +45.2%, so Quirindi has compounded faster than Abbotsbury over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Quirindi and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Quirindi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 3,355, larger than Quirindi; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Quirindi for rental income, Quirindi for recent price momentum, Quirindi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison