Abbotsbury vs Rocky Point
Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Rocky Point, NSW 2259
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 0, Rocky Point wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Abbotsbury | Rocky Point |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.8M | - |
| Median unit price | $770K | $585K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.81% | 3.90% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.36% | 5.33% |
| 1-year house growth | +10.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +22.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 5.2% | 2.1% |
| Population | 4,200 | 275 |
Abbotsbury vs Rocky Point: what the numbers say
For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $585K in Rocky Point, which makes Rocky Point the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.
On cash flow, Rocky Point leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 2.81% in Abbotsbury, a gap of 1.09 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Rocky Point and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Rocky Point face less competition for tenants.
Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 275, roughly 15 times the size of Rocky Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Rocky Point for rental income, Rocky Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison