Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Tacoma

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Tacoma, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 3, Tacoma wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyTacoma
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%2.28%
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%5.14%
1-year house growth+10.8%+6.2%
3-year house growth+22.3%+19.2%
Vacancy rate5.2%2.3%
Population4,200615

Abbotsbury vs Tacoma: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $580K in Tacoma, which makes Tacoma the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abbotsbury leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.81%, compared with 2.28% in Tacoma, a gap of 0.53 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +6.2% in Tacoma, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Tacoma houses +19.2%, so Abbotsbury has compounded faster than Tacoma over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.3% in Tacoma and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Tacoma face less competition for tenants.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 615, roughly 7 times the size of Tacoma; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for rental income, Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Tacoma for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Abbotsbury vs Tacoma: Property Investment Comparison (2026)