Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Tyalgum

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Tyalgum, NSW 2484

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 0, Tyalgum wins 6. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyTyalgum
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%4.45%
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%5.93%
1-year house growth+10.8%+11.4%
3-year house growth+22.3%+55.1%
Vacancy rate5.2%1.9%
Population4,200521

Abbotsbury vs Tyalgum: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $580K in Tyalgum, which makes Tyalgum the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.

On cash flow, Tyalgum leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.45%, compared with 2.81% in Abbotsbury, a gap of 1.64 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +11.4% in Tyalgum, so recent momentum favours Tyalgum, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Tyalgum houses +55.1%, so Tyalgum has compounded faster than Abbotsbury over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Tyalgum and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Tyalgum face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 521, roughly 8 times the size of Tyalgum; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tyalgum for rental income, Tyalgum for recent price momentum, Tyalgum for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison