Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Vineyard

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Vineyard, NSW 2765

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 2, Vineyard wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyVineyard
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$550K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%3.34%
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%5.17%
1-year house growth+10.8%+7.7%
3-year house growth+22.3%+16.8%
Vacancy rate5.2%0.5%
Population4,2001,143

Abbotsbury vs Vineyard: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $550K in Vineyard, which makes Vineyard the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.

On cash flow, Vineyard leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.34%, compared with 2.81% in Abbotsbury, a gap of 0.53 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +7.7% in Vineyard, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Vineyard houses +16.8%, so Abbotsbury has compounded faster than Vineyard over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Vineyard and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Vineyard face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 1,143, roughly 3.7 times the size of Vineyard; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Vineyard for rental income, Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Vineyard for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison