Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Wyrallah

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Wyrallah, NSW 2480

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 2, Wyrallah wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyWyrallah
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$455K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%3.20%
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%4.96%
1-year house growth+10.8%+8.0%
3-year house growth+22.3%-
Vacancy rate5.2%6.1%
Population4,200493

Abbotsbury vs Wyrallah: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $455K in Wyrallah, which makes Wyrallah the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.

On cash flow, Wyrallah leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.20%, compared with 2.81% in Abbotsbury, a gap of 0.39 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +8.0% in Wyrallah, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 5.2% in Abbotsbury and 6.1% in Wyrallah, so landlords in Abbotsbury face less competition for tenants.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 493, roughly 9 times the size of Wyrallah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wyrallah for rental income, Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Abbotsbury for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison