Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Yarrawonga Park

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Yarrawonga Park, NSW 2264

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 2, Yarrawonga Park wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyYarrawonga Park
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%5.23%
1-year house growth+10.8%+5.3%
3-year house growth+22.3%+12.7%
Vacancy rate5.2%2.4%
Population4,200390

Abbotsbury vs Yarrawonga Park: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $585K in Yarrawonga Park, which makes Yarrawonga Park the more affordable unit market and Abbotsbury the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +5.3% in Yarrawonga Park, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Yarrawonga Park houses +12.7%, so Abbotsbury has compounded faster than Yarrawonga Park over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Yarrawonga Park and 5.2% in Abbotsbury, so landlords in Yarrawonga Park face less competition for tenants.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 390, roughly 11 times the size of Yarrawonga Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Yarrawonga Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison