Skip to main content

Abbotsbury vs Yattalunga

Property investment comparison - Abbotsbury, NSW 2176 vs Yattalunga, NSW 2251

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsbury wins 5, Yattalunga wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsburyYattalunga
Median house price$1.8M-
Median unit price$770K$835K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.81%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.36%4.01%
1-year house growth+10.8%+5.1%
3-year house growth+22.3%+21.4%
Vacancy rate5.2%6.5%
Population4,200580

Abbotsbury vs Yattalunga: what the numbers say

For units, Abbotsbury sits at a median of $770K against $835K in Yattalunga, which makes Abbotsbury the more affordable unit market and Yattalunga the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Abbotsbury and +5.1% in Yattalunga, so recent momentum favours Abbotsbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Abbotsbury houses are +22.3% and Yattalunga houses +21.4%, so Abbotsbury has compounded faster than Yattalunga over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 5.2% in Abbotsbury and 6.5% in Yattalunga, so landlords in Abbotsbury face less competition for tenants.

Abbotsbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,200 against 580, roughly 7 times the size of Yattalunga; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsbury for recent price momentum, Abbotsbury for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison