Skip to main content

Abbotsford vs Annangrove

Property investment comparison - Abbotsford, NSW 2046 vs Annangrove, NSW 2156

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsford wins 3, Annangrove wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsfordAnnangrove
Median house price$3.5M$3.5M
Median unit price$1.4M$1.4M
Gross rental yield (houses)-1.58%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.92%
1-year house growth-1.2%estimate-7.2%
3-year house growth--2.0%
Vacancy rate1.3%1.7%
Population5,4311,472

Abbotsford vs Annangrove: what the numbers say

The median house price is $3.5M in Abbotsford and $3.5M in Annangrove, so Abbotsford is the cheaper entry point, with Annangrove houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Abbotsford sits at a median of $1.4M against $1.4M in Annangrove, which makes Annangrove the more affordable unit market and Abbotsford the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -1.2% in Abbotsford (an estimate) and -7.2% in Annangrove, so recent momentum favours Abbotsford, while Annangrove went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Abbotsford and 1.7% in Annangrove, so landlords in Abbotsford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abbotsford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,431 against 1,472, roughly 3.7 times the size of Annangrove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abbotsford for a lower purchase price, Abbotsford for recent price momentum, Abbotsford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison