Skip to main content

Abbotsford vs Warrawee

Property investment comparison - Abbotsford, NSW 2046 vs Warrawee, NSW 2074

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abbotsford wins 2, Warrawee wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbbotsfordWarrawee
Median house price$3.5M$3.5M
Median unit price$1.4M$935K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.44%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth-1.2%estimate-5.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.3%2.0%
Population5,4313,170

Abbotsford vs Warrawee: what the numbers say

The median house price is $3.5M in Abbotsford and $3.5M in Warrawee, so Warrawee is the cheaper entry point, with Abbotsford houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Abbotsford sits at a median of $1.4M against $935K in Warrawee, which makes Warrawee the more affordable unit market and Abbotsford the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -1.2% in Abbotsford (an estimate) and -5.2% in Warrawee (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Abbotsford, while Warrawee went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Abbotsford and 2.0% in Warrawee, so landlords in Abbotsford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Abbotsford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,431 against 3,170, larger than Warrawee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Warrawee for a lower purchase price, Abbotsford for recent price momentum, Abbotsford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison