Aberdeen vs Breakfast Point
Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs Breakfast Point, NSW 2137
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 2, Breakfast Point wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdeen | Breakfast Point |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $620K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $1.5M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.85% | 2.31% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +9.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +48.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 2.3% |
| Population | 2,051 | 4,678 |
Aberdeen vs Breakfast Point: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Aberdeen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.85%, compared with 2.31% in Breakfast Point, a gap of 2.54 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Aberdeen and 2.3% in Breakfast Point, so landlords in Aberdeen face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Breakfast Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,678 against 2,051, roughly 2.3 times the size of Aberdeen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberdeen for rental income, Aberdeen for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Breakfast Point, NSW 2137
Open Breakfast Point suburb profileRecent sales in Breakfast Point
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison