Skip to main content

Aberdeen vs Canada Bay

Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs Canada Bay, NSW 2046

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 4, Canada Bay wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdeenCanada Bay
Median house price$620K-
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.85%1.71%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.50%
1-year house growth+9.5%+5.9%
3-year house growth+48.1%+16.2%
Vacancy rate1.9%2.4%
Population2,0511,308

Aberdeen vs Canada Bay: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Aberdeen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.85%, compared with 1.71% in Canada Bay, a gap of 3.14 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Aberdeen and +5.9% in Canada Bay, so recent momentum favours Aberdeen, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aberdeen houses are +48.1% and Canada Bay houses +16.2%, so Aberdeen has compounded faster than Canada Bay over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Aberdeen and 2.4% in Canada Bay, so landlords in Aberdeen face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdeen is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,051 against 1,308, larger than Canada Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdeen for rental income, Aberdeen for recent price momentum, Aberdeen for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison