Aberdeen vs Fingal Head
Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs Fingal Head, NSW 2487
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 2, Fingal Head wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdeen | Fingal Head |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $620K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $1.2M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.85% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.79% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.5% | +9.4% |
| 3-year house growth | +48.1% | +1.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 1.7% |
| Population | 2,051 | 615 |
Aberdeen vs Fingal Head: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Aberdeen and +9.4% in Fingal Head, so recent momentum favours Aberdeen, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Aberdeen houses are +48.1% and Fingal Head houses +1.8%, so Aberdeen has compounded faster than Fingal Head over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Fingal Head and 1.9% in Aberdeen, so landlords in Fingal Head face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aberdeen is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,051 against 615, roughly 3.3 times the size of Fingal Head; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberdeen for recent price momentum, Fingal Head for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison