Skip to main content

Aberdeen vs Glenhaven

Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs Glenhaven, NSW 2156

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 4, Glenhaven wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdeenGlenhaven
Median house price$620K-
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.85%2.26%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.12%
1-year house growth+9.5%-4.7%
3-year house growth+48.1%-3.1%
Vacancy rate1.9%4.7%
Population2,0516,619

Aberdeen vs Glenhaven: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Aberdeen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.85%, compared with 2.26% in Glenhaven, a gap of 2.59 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Aberdeen and -4.7% in Glenhaven, so recent momentum favours Aberdeen, while Glenhaven went backwards.

Looking back three years, Aberdeen houses are +48.1% and Glenhaven houses -3.1%, so Aberdeen has compounded faster than Glenhaven over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Aberdeen and 4.7% in Glenhaven, so landlords in Aberdeen face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Glenhaven is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,619 against 2,051, roughly 3.2 times the size of Aberdeen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdeen for rental income, Aberdeen for recent price momentum, Aberdeen for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison