Skip to main content

Aberdeen vs Greenwich

Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs Greenwich, NSW 2065

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 4, Greenwich wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdeenGreenwich
Median house price$620K-
Median unit price-$880K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.85%2.02%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.26%
1-year house growth+9.5%-5.2%
3-year house growth+48.1%-1.5%
Vacancy rate1.9%2.2%
Population2,0515,469

Aberdeen vs Greenwich: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Aberdeen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.85%, compared with 2.02% in Greenwich, a gap of 2.83 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Aberdeen and -5.2% in Greenwich, so recent momentum favours Aberdeen, while Greenwich went backwards.

Looking back three years, Aberdeen houses are +48.1% and Greenwich houses -1.5%, so Aberdeen has compounded faster than Greenwich over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Aberdeen and 2.2% in Greenwich, so landlords in Aberdeen face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Greenwich is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,469 against 2,051, roughly 2.7 times the size of Aberdeen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdeen for rental income, Aberdeen for recent price momentum, Aberdeen for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison