Skip to main content

Aberdeen vs Kotara

Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs Kotara, NSW 2289

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 3, Kotara wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdeenKotara
Median house price$620K-
Median unit price-$840K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.85%3.55%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.92%
1-year house growth+9.5%+9.3%
3-year house growth+48.1%+11.9%
Vacancy rate1.9%1.4%
Population2,0513,980

Aberdeen vs Kotara: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Aberdeen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.85%, compared with 3.55% in Kotara, a gap of 1.30 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Aberdeen and +9.3% in Kotara, so recent momentum favours Aberdeen, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aberdeen houses are +48.1% and Kotara houses +11.9%, so Aberdeen has compounded faster than Kotara over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Kotara and 1.9% in Aberdeen, so landlords in Kotara face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kotara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,980 against 2,051, larger than Aberdeen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdeen for rental income, Aberdeen for recent price momentum, Kotara for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Aberdeen vs Kotara: Property Investment Comparison (2026)