Aberdeen vs Newcastle East
Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs Newcastle East, NSW 2300
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 1, Newcastle East wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdeen | Newcastle East |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $620K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $1.7M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.85% | 2.20% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.60% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +48.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 1.1% |
| Population | 2,051 | 1,061 |
Aberdeen vs Newcastle East: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Aberdeen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.85%, compared with 2.20% in Newcastle East, a gap of 2.65 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Newcastle East and 1.9% in Aberdeen, so landlords in Newcastle East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aberdeen is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,051 against 1,061, larger than Newcastle East; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberdeen for rental income, Newcastle East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Newcastle East, NSW 2300
Open Newcastle East suburb profileRecent sales in Newcastle East
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison