Skip to main content

Aberdeen vs North Wollongong

Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs North Wollongong, NSW 2500

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 2, North Wollongong wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdeenNorth Wollongong
Median house price$620K-
Median unit price-$770K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.85%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.18%
1-year house growth+9.5%+7.2%
3-year house growth+48.1%-10.0%
Vacancy rate1.9%1.0%
Population2,0512,299

Aberdeen vs North Wollongong: what the numbers say

Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Aberdeen and +7.2% in North Wollongong, so recent momentum favours Aberdeen, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aberdeen houses are +48.1% and North Wollongong houses -10.0%, so Aberdeen has compounded faster than North Wollongong over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in North Wollongong and 1.9% in Aberdeen, so landlords in North Wollongong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

North Wollongong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,299 against 2,051, larger than Aberdeen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdeen for recent price momentum, North Wollongong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison