Aberdeen vs Peel
Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs Peel, NSW 2795
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 1, Peel wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdeen | Peel |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $620K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $455K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.85% | 2.27% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.72% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +48.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 0.5% |
| Population | 2,051 | 256 |
Aberdeen vs Peel: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Aberdeen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.85%, compared with 2.27% in Peel, a gap of 2.58 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Peel and 1.9% in Aberdeen, so landlords in Peel face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aberdeen is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,051 against 256, roughly 8 times the size of Peel; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberdeen for rental income, Peel for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison