Skip to main content

Aberdeen vs Tolland

Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs Tolland, NSW 2650

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 3, Tolland wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdeenTolland
Median house price$620K$625K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.85%4.19%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+9.5%+19.9%estimate
3-year house growth+48.1%-
Vacancy rate1.9%2.4%
Population2,0513,459

Aberdeen vs Tolland: what the numbers say

The median house price is $620K in Aberdeen and $625K in Tolland, so Aberdeen is the cheaper entry point, with Tolland houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Aberdeen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.85%, compared with 4.19% in Tolland, a gap of 0.66 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Aberdeen and +19.9% in Tolland (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Tolland, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Aberdeen and 2.4% in Tolland, so landlords in Aberdeen face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tolland is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,459 against 2,051, larger than Aberdeen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdeen for rental income, Aberdeen for a lower purchase price, Tolland for recent price momentum, Aberdeen for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison