Aberdeen vs Tyalgum
Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs Tyalgum, NSW 2484
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 1, Tyalgum wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdeen | Tyalgum |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $620K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $580K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.85% | 4.45% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.93% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.5% | +11.4% |
| 3-year house growth | +48.1% | +55.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Population | 2,051 | 521 |
Aberdeen vs Tyalgum: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Aberdeen leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.85%, compared with 4.45% in Tyalgum, a gap of 0.40 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Aberdeen and +11.4% in Tyalgum, so recent momentum favours Tyalgum, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Aberdeen houses are +48.1% and Tyalgum houses +55.1%, so Tyalgum has compounded faster than Aberdeen over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.9%.
Aberdeen is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,051 against 521, roughly 3.9 times the size of Tyalgum; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberdeen for rental income, Tyalgum for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison