Aberdeen vs West Gosford
Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs West Gosford, NSW 2250
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 2, West Gosford wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdeen | West Gosford |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $620K | - |
| Median unit price | - | $650K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.85% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.20% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.5% | +1.8% |
| 3-year house growth | +48.1% | +19.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 1.0% |
| Population | 2,051 | 1,602 |
Aberdeen vs West Gosford: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Aberdeen and +1.8% in West Gosford, so recent momentum favours Aberdeen, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Aberdeen houses are +48.1% and West Gosford houses +19.0%, so Aberdeen has compounded faster than West Gosford over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in West Gosford and 1.9% in Aberdeen, so landlords in West Gosford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aberdeen is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,051 against 1,602, larger than West Gosford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberdeen for recent price momentum, West Gosford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison