Skip to main content

Aberdeen vs Yarrawonga Park

Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, NSW 2336 vs Yarrawonga Park, NSW 2264

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 3, Yarrawonga Park wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberdeenYarrawonga Park
Median house price$620K-
Median unit price-$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.85%-
Gross rental yield (units)-5.23%
1-year house growth+9.5%+5.3%
3-year house growth+48.1%+12.7%
Vacancy rate1.9%2.4%
Population2,051390

Aberdeen vs Yarrawonga Park: what the numbers say

Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Aberdeen and +5.3% in Yarrawonga Park, so recent momentum favours Aberdeen, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aberdeen houses are +48.1% and Yarrawonga Park houses +12.7%, so Aberdeen has compounded faster than Yarrawonga Park over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Aberdeen and 2.4% in Yarrawonga Park, so landlords in Aberdeen face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberdeen is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,051 against 390, roughly 5 times the size of Yarrawonga Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aberdeen for recent price momentum, Aberdeen for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison