Aberdeen vs Adventure Bay
Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, TAS 7310 vs Adventure Bay, TAS 7150
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 2, Adventure Bay wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdeen | Adventure Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $700K | $700K |
| Median unit price | $200K | $350K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.71% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.79% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +4.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 4.5% |
| Population | 268 | 218 |
Aberdeen vs Adventure Bay: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $700K in Aberdeen and $700K in Adventure Bay.
For units, Aberdeen sits at a median of $200K against $350K in Adventure Bay, which makes Aberdeen the more affordable unit market and Adventure Bay the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Aberdeen and 4.5% in Adventure Bay, so landlords in Aberdeen face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aberdeen is the bigger suburb, with a population of 268 against 218, larger than Adventure Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberdeen for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison