Aberdeen vs Moonah
Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, TAS 7310 vs Moonah, TAS 7009
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 1, Moonah wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdeen | Moonah |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $700K | $700K |
| Median unit price | $200K | $485K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.80% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.36% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +13.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +9.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 0.7% |
| Population | 268 | 5,884 |
Aberdeen vs Moonah: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $700K in Aberdeen and $700K in Moonah.
For units, Aberdeen sits at a median of $200K against $485K in Moonah, which makes Aberdeen the more affordable unit market and Moonah the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.7%.
Moonah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,884 against 268, roughly 22 times the size of Aberdeen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison