Aberdeen vs Trevallyn
Property investment comparison - Aberdeen, TAS 7310 vs Trevallyn, TAS 7250
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberdeen wins 1, Trevallyn wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aberdeen | Trevallyn |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $700K | $700K |
| Median unit price | $200K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.23% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.65% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +13.1%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 2.5% |
| Population | 268 | 4,826 |
Aberdeen vs Trevallyn: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $700K in Aberdeen and $700K in Trevallyn.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Aberdeen and 2.5% in Trevallyn, so landlords in Aberdeen face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Trevallyn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,826 against 268, roughly 18 times the size of Aberdeen; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aberdeen for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison