Skip to main content

Aberglasslyn vs Llanarth

Property investment comparison - Aberglasslyn, NSW 2320 vs Llanarth, NSW 2795

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aberglasslyn wins 1, Llanarth wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAberglasslynLlanarth
Median house price$860K$860K
Median unit price$700K$455K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.90%3.95%
Gross rental yield (units)4.50%5.20%
1-year house growth+11.1%+6.6%estimate
3-year house growth+22.4%-
Vacancy rate2.0%1.1%
Population6,5522,302

Aberglasslyn vs Llanarth: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $860K in Aberglasslyn and $860K in Llanarth.

For units, Aberglasslyn sits at a median of $700K against $455K in Llanarth, which makes Llanarth the more affordable unit market and Aberglasslyn the pricier one.

On cash flow, Llanarth leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.95%, compared with 3.90% in Aberglasslyn, a gap of 0.05 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.1% in Aberglasslyn and +6.6% in Llanarth (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Aberglasslyn, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Llanarth and 2.0% in Aberglasslyn, so landlords in Llanarth face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aberglasslyn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,552 against 2,302, roughly 2.8 times the size of Llanarth; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Llanarth for rental income, Aberglasslyn for recent price momentum, Llanarth for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison