Skip to main content

Abington vs Booval

Property investment comparison - Abington, QLD 4660 vs Booval, QLD 4304

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Abington wins 3, Booval wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAbingtonBooval
Median house price$810K$805K
Median unit price$210K$660K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.79%3.67%
Gross rental yield (units)6.17%3.79%
1-year house growth-+23.5%
3-year house growth-+62.8%
Vacancy rate1.9%0.9%
Population602,723

Abington vs Booval: what the numbers say

The median house price is $810K in Abington and $805K in Booval, so Booval is the cheaper entry point, with Abington houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Abington sits at a median of $210K against $660K in Booval, which makes Abington the more affordable unit market and Booval the pricier one.

On cash flow, Abington leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.79%, compared with 3.67% in Booval, a gap of 0.12 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Booval and 1.9% in Abington, so landlords in Booval face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Booval is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,723 against 60, roughly 45 times the size of Abington; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Abington for rental income, Booval for a lower purchase price, Booval for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison