Skip to main content

Acacia Hills vs Preservation Bay

Property investment comparison - Acacia Hills, TAS 7306 vs Preservation Bay, TAS 7316

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Acacia Hills wins 1, Preservation Bay wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAcacia HillsPreservation Bay
Median house price$800K-
Median unit price$420K$410K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.96%3.43%
Gross rental yield (units)4.48%4.65%
1-year house growth+7.6%-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.8%0.9%
Population729100

Acacia Hills vs Preservation Bay: what the numbers say

For units, Acacia Hills sits at a median of $420K against $410K in Preservation Bay, which makes Preservation Bay the more affordable unit market and Acacia Hills the pricier one.

On cash flow, Preservation Bay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.43%, compared with 2.96% in Acacia Hills, a gap of 0.47 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Acacia Hills and 0.9% in Preservation Bay, so landlords in Acacia Hills face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Acacia Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 729 against 100, roughly 7 times the size of Preservation Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Preservation Bay for rental income, Acacia Hills for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison