Acacia Hills vs Wesley Vale
Property investment comparison - Acacia Hills, TAS 7306 vs Wesley Vale, TAS 7307
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Acacia Hills wins 3, Wesley Vale wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Acacia Hills | Wesley Vale |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $800K | - |
| Median unit price | $420K | $620K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.96% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.48% | 4.17% |
| 1-year house growth | +7.6% | +22.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +19.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 3.5% |
| Population | 729 | 483 |
Acacia Hills vs Wesley Vale: what the numbers say
For units, Acacia Hills sits at a median of $420K against $620K in Wesley Vale, which makes Acacia Hills the more affordable unit market and Wesley Vale the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +7.6% in Acacia Hills and +22.1% in Wesley Vale, so recent momentum favours Wesley Vale, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Acacia Hills and 3.5% in Wesley Vale, so landlords in Acacia Hills face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Acacia Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 729 against 483, larger than Wesley Vale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wesley Vale for recent price momentum, Acacia Hills for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison