Acacia Hills vs West Pine
Property investment comparison - Acacia Hills, TAS 7306 vs West Pine, TAS 7316
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Acacia Hills wins 1, West Pine wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Acacia Hills | West Pine |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $800K | - |
| Median unit price | $420K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.96% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.48% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +7.6% | -8.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 0.6% |
| Population | 729 | 142 |
Acacia Hills vs West Pine: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +7.6% in Acacia Hills and -8.6% in West Pine (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Acacia Hills, while West Pine went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in West Pine and 0.8% in Acacia Hills, so landlords in West Pine face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Acacia Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 729 against 142, roughly 5 times the size of West Pine; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Acacia Hills for recent price momentum, West Pine for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison