Skip to main content

Acton vs Orford

Property investment comparison - Acton, TAS 7320 vs Orford, TAS 7190

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Acton wins 4, Orford wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricActonOrford
Median house price$480K-
Median unit price$490K$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)4.90%3.59%
Gross rental yield (units)3.99%1.85%
1-year house growth+21.6%+13.7%estimate
3-year house growth+30.3%-
Vacancy rate2.0%1.9%
Population1,377685

Acton vs Orford: what the numbers say

For units, Acton sits at a median of $490K against $1.1M in Orford, which makes Acton the more affordable unit market and Orford the pricier one.

On cash flow, Acton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.90%, compared with 3.59% in Orford, a gap of 1.31 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +21.6% in Acton and +13.7% in Orford (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Acton, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Orford and 2.0% in Acton, so landlords in Orford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Acton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,377 against 685, roughly 2.0 times the size of Orford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Acton for rental income, Acton for recent price momentum, Orford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison