Skip to main content

Acton vs Preservation Bay

Property investment comparison - Acton, TAS 7320 vs Preservation Bay, TAS 7316

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Acton wins 1, Preservation Bay wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricActonPreservation Bay
Median house price$480K-
Median unit price$490K$410K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.90%3.43%
Gross rental yield (units)3.99%4.65%
1-year house growth+21.6%-
3-year house growth+30.3%-
Vacancy rate2.0%0.9%
Population1,377100

Acton vs Preservation Bay: what the numbers say

For units, Acton sits at a median of $490K against $410K in Preservation Bay, which makes Preservation Bay the more affordable unit market and Acton the pricier one.

On cash flow, Acton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.90%, compared with 3.43% in Preservation Bay, a gap of 1.47 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Preservation Bay and 2.0% in Acton, so landlords in Preservation Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Acton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,377 against 100, roughly 14 times the size of Preservation Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Acton for rental income, Preservation Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison