Skip to main content

Adare vs Burpengary

Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs Burpengary, QLD 4505

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 3, Burpengary wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdareBurpengary
Median house price$930K-
Median unit price$285K$665K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%3.50%
Gross rental yield (units)5.66%-
1-year house growth+17.6%estimate+18.9%
3-year house growth-+39.4%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.5%
Population1,02716,488

Adare vs Burpengary: what the numbers say

For units, Adare sits at a median of $285K against $665K in Burpengary, which makes Adare the more affordable unit market and Burpengary the pricier one.

On cash flow, Adare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 3.50% in Burpengary, a gap of 0.24 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Adare (an estimate) and +18.9% in Burpengary, so recent momentum favours Burpengary, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Adare and 1.5% in Burpengary, so landlords in Adare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Burpengary is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,488 against 1,027, roughly 16 times the size of Adare; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Adare for rental income, Burpengary for recent price momentum, Adare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison