Skip to main content

Adare vs Diamond Valley

Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs Diamond Valley, QLD 4553

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 3, Diamond Valley wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdareDiamond Valley
Median house price$930K-
Median unit price$285K$285K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%2.72%
Gross rental yield (units)5.66%6.98%
1-year house growth+17.6%estimate+15.8%
3-year house growth-+28.7%
Vacancy rate0.9%4.7%
Population1,027489

Adare vs Diamond Valley: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Adare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 2.72% in Diamond Valley, a gap of 1.02 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Adare (an estimate) and +15.8% in Diamond Valley, so recent momentum favours Adare, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Adare and 4.7% in Diamond Valley, so landlords in Adare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Adare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,027 against 489, roughly 2.1 times the size of Diamond Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Adare for rental income, Adare for recent price momentum, Adare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison